Prediction of Xiao Zhou vs Tatia Mikadze Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
X. Zhou vs T. Mikadze

Xiao Zhou

CHN

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

524

Best Rank

281

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

$3.0K

Plays

Tatia Mikadze

GEO

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

524

Best Rank

281

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

$3.0K

Plays

Head-to-head: Zhou 1 - 0 Mikadze

They have played 3 sets in total, with Xiao Zhou winning 2 and Tatia Mikadze winning 1. The last match between Xiao Zhou and Tatia Mikadze was at the Fuzhou, 05-07-2010, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Xiao Zhou getting the victory 6-3 4-6 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Zhou	1
Mikadze	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(QF) Fuzhou(07-05-10)

Stats

Xiao Zhou

Tatia Mikadze

X. Zhou vs T. Mikadze H2H Profile

X. Zhou	Stats	T. Mikadze
$0	Career Prize Money	$2,950
59.32% (35-24)	Career Total W/L	62.60% (77-46)
1	Hard	0
0	Titles	3
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

X. Zhou vs T. Mikadze Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Xiao Zhou has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Tatia Mikadze has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Xiao Zhou, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tatia Mikadze has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Xiao Zhou has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tatia Mikadze has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Xiao Zhou has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Tatia Mikadze winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Xiao Zhou has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 75% (W/L 9/3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Tatia Mikadze has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 75% (W/L 55/22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 3/5).
Player level: In the last year, Xiao Zhou has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Tatia Mikadze has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Xiao Zhou winning 1 times and Tatia Mikadze being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Xiao Zhou winning 2 and Tatia Mikadze winning 1.
The last match between Xiao Zhou and Tatia Mikadze was at the Fuzhou, 05-07-2010, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Xiao Zhou getting the victory 6-3 4-6 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Xiao Zhou has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Tatia Mikadze has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Xiao Zhou has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tatia Mikadze has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Xiao Zhou has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tatia Mikadze has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Xiao Zhou vs Tatia Mikadze Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

X. Zhou vs T. Mikadze H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

X. Zhou	Stats	T. Mikadze
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
16	Games Won	10
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

X. Zhou Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Beijing - 08-07-2013
Q3 Fangzhou LiuF. Liu	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
R2 Sheng-Nan SunS. Sun	W	6-2 2-6 6-1	Stats
Q2 Kai-Lin ZhangK. Zhang	W	6-7(3) 6-4 6-1	Stats
Q1 Chang LiuC. Liu	W	6-7(1) 6-3 6-1	Stats
QF Saisai ZhengS. Zheng	L	6-3 6-2	Stats

View All

T. Mikadze Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
W15 Tbilisi - 17-05-2021
Q1 Alana TuayevaA. Tuayeva	L	6-4 2-0 ret.	Stats
Batumi - 11-09-2017
R1 Nina StojanovicN. Stojanovic	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Q3 Daria KruzhkovaD. Kruzhkova	W	6-2 6-1	Stats
Q1 Anna KadagidzeA. Kadagidze	W	6-1 6-1	Stats
Telavi - 10-07-2017
SF Ekaterine GorgodzeE. Gorgodze	L	6-4 6-1	Stats

View All

X. Zhou vs T. Mikadze Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

X. Zhou	Stats	T. Mikadze
59.32% (35/24)	YTD Win/Loss	62.60% (77/46)
55.56% (75/60)	Sets Win/Loss	61.65% (172/107)
52.44% (646/586)	Games Win/Loss	55.03% (1363/1114)
56.52% (26/20)	Hard Win/Loss	51.35% (19/18)
75.00% (9/3)	Clay Win/Loss	71.43% (55/22)
0.00% (0/1)	Indoor Hard W/L	33.33% (3/6)
0	Aces Per Game	0.01
0	Aces Total	12
0	Double Faults Per Game	0.02
0	Total Double Faults	23
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
614.64	Average Opponent Rank	552.84
0% (0/0)	1st Serve %	62% (542/872)
0% (0/0)	1st Serve Win %	58% (314/542)
0% (0/0)	2nd Serve Win %	47% (156/330)
0% (0/0)	Break Points Won % (Total)	59% (55/93)
0% (0/0)	Return Points Win %	49% (377/774)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	0.00% (0/1)
0.00% (0/1)	Main Tour W/L	50.00% (2/2)
56.82% (25/19)	Challenger W/L	57.58% (38/28)
71.43% (10/4)	Futures W/L	71.15% (37/15)
59% (34/58)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	62% (75/121)
50% (5/10)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	59% (10/17)
67% (12/18)	Deciding Set Win %	43% (15/35)
94% (32/30)	1st Set Won, Won Match	88% (77/68)
6% (32/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	12% (77/9)
15% (27/4)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	17% (46/8)